Time to ditch Facebook?

Is It Time For Your Company To Ditch Facebook?

Gee Ranasinha Marketing 8 Comments

Over the past few weeks we’ve been doing a bit of spring cleaning here at KEXINO Towers.

The dust bunnies from the servers and desktop computers have been cleared. The last few hard drives that aren’t SSDs have been either defragmented or replaced. Files and bookmarks kept in folders with names like “Desktop Stuff” or “To Keep” have been either indexed or binned.

I’ve also taken a long, hard look at our lead generation and social media outreach efforts and re-evaluating what’s working and what’s not. Unsurprisingly, there’s a bit of a shake-up there too.

For our company, the single most effective digital vehicle in terms of lead generation is this blog. No real surprises there. But what’s interesting is how the ROI on our social media efforts has evolved over the past 12 months.

Spring Cleaning Our Online Properties

We find Twitter, LinkedIn and Google+ continue to pay their way in terms of efforts expelled vs. results achieved. However as far as Facebook is concerned, I think it’s time to cut the cord.

As I’m sure you’re aware, Facebook have changed their terms regarding how a company’s Facebook page is seen in the timelines of its followers.

In the old days pretty much everyone who “liked” your company Facebook page would see every one of your updates in their timeline, allowing businesses to easily (and affordably) keep in touch with their followers. There was also the ability to reach an even larger number of people if your content got Liked/Shared, as your audience’s own network would also get to see your content.

Today, however, all that’s changed.

Facebook no longer automatically pushes your content to the people that have “liked” your page. In fact today only around 6% of your audience (and often more like 2%) receives your content updates. Today, if you want to reach your audience (people who – as you remember – had made a conscious decision to choose to receiving your information) you have to pay Facebook each and every time you update your status. (Remember we’re only talking about Facebook business pages – the reach from your personal Facebook account hasn’t changed).

Cutting The Cord On Facebook

As you can imagine, since Facebook made this change there’s been a bit of an outcry. Yes, I think Facebook’s behavior is kind of scummy. But then again Facebook is a commercial organization who, as a public company, has a duty to its shareholders to increase profitability. In addition Facebook want us to stay on Facebook for as long as possible, and low-quality corporate updates makes people want to leave the site.

As Facebook users we all hate the 99% of interruptive, corporate chest-beating promotional rubbish that companies produce to contaminate our news feeds. We want to see, useful “likeable” and “shareable” content – whether that’s from friends and family, or even from a brand.

Facebook know this too, and have decided to show fewer business page updates because they know that’s what we want. You could say that this whole situation has only come about because there are too many companies out there with sucky Facebook tactics…

So Facebook’s new plan is that customer-focussed companies produce their amazing content and pay Facebook to get it to the people that have “liked” their page. The belief is that if the content is seen as being sufficiently “wow” then the people who receive it will not only “like” it, but they will comment on it or share it. This is then interpreted by Facebook that Company X is producing good stuff, so the next time the business shares something on their timeline it gets pushed out even further.

What’s a Startup / Small Business To Do?

That’s all fine and dandy. But what about the millions of start-ups and small businesses that have listened to people like yours-truly and built-up a following on Facebook, but can no longer reach their audience without putting their hands in their pockets? Companies that don’t have the budget to continually reach an audience that they were previously reaching for free, and whose content – while perhaps not earth-shattering – was certainly seen to have value in the minds of their followers?

Paid Social Media Reach Is Called Advertising, Isn’t It?

The thing about Facebook is that it’s a bit like the telephone. It’s a really good way to chat to someone, however it’s not that great for selling.

Facebook’s old model had two tiers – “free” and “paid”. Free was setting-up your Facebook brand page and promoting it to get your target audience to “like” it. Once you had done that you could create your content, ply your wares, interact with your followers, and so on.

Facebook’s “paid” model was for a company to buy advertising space. You’d take out an ad and Facebook would put that ad on people’s Facebook pages. Facebook would even use tech that pushed these ads to you even when you weren’t on Facebook.

Based upon their actions it would seem that Facebook are now saying that the “free” model doesn’t work, and that companies now need to pay if they are to get their content out there.

But if the content was deemed to be rubbish when it was free, how can it now have value simply because you’ve had to pay to distribute it?

We’re Leaving Facebook – And Suggest You Do The Same

If your business has a Facebook page, what are your plans for moving forward?

From our side we’ve been reducing our Facebook updates gradually since the beginning of the year – and letting our audience know, along the way. Over the next few weeks we’re going to be phasing things out even more. We’re lucky in that our main lead-generation activities (email, social media, and SEO) continue to be successful for us. However I really feel for all of those businesses who are now stuck between a rock and a hard place.

When Time Magazine recently contacted Facebook about the change in policy, a spokeswoman replied, “Like many mediums, if businesses want to make sure that people see their content, the best strategy is, and always has been, paid advertising.”

The world’s biggest social network by number of users, advocating businesses use paid advertising rather than social media to reach their audience?

Hmmm….


About the Author
Avatar for Gee Ranasinha

Gee Ranasinha

Facebook Twitter Google+

After founding a successful media production firm, Gee became worldwide director of marketing for a European software company. As well as CEO of KEXINO he's an author, lecturer, husband, and father; and one hell of a nice bloke. He lives in a world of his own in Strasbourg, France, tolerated by his wife and young son. Find out more about Gee at kexino.com/gee-ranasinha.



Share this with your friends










Submit

Want to receive our articles by email? Type your email address in here »  then click on this »

Comments 8

  1. Avatar for Gee Ranasinha
    1. Avatar for Gee Ranasinha
  2. Avatar for Gee Ranasinha
    1. Avatar for Gee Ranasinha
  3. Avatar for Gee Ranasinha

    Should it be a good move to go back to a personal page for the businnes to reach friends instead of followers? (For new businnes, as long as we reach 5,000, friends)

    1. Avatar for Gee Ranasinha

      Hi Jorge. Depending on the business I think you may have issues using a personal page to reach people. You’d be reliant on ‘strangers’ agreeing to accept your friend request, in order that your content appeared in their timeline. I don’t know about you, but I never accept friend requests from people that I don’t know at some level or another.

      I think that we all just need to accept that we now need to pay for the reach that, previously, we got for for free. Depending on the business and the content strategy, paying for Facebook reach might be a good move. We need to either move to another channel, or put our hands in our pockets.

      1. Avatar for Gee Ranasinha
        1. Avatar for Gee Ranasinha

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *